Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs GeForce GT 340 OEM

Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Memory: 0Mb System SharedDESKTOP
Release date: 5 Sep 2014
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
GeForce GT 340 OEM
Memory: 1024Mb GDDR3DESKTOP
Release date: 2 Feb 2010
GeForce GT 340 OEM

Summary

Reasons to consider Iris Pro Graphics 6200

54 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GT 340 OEM .
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support.

Reasons to consider GeForce GT 340 OEM

Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications
PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor

No clear winner declared

We have no data to declare a winner at this time.


Specifications

Core Configuration

Iris Pro Graphics 6200GeForce GT 340 OEM
GPU NameBroadwell GT3e ()vsGT215 (GT215-301-A3)
Fab Process14 nmvs40 nm
Die Size49 mm²vs144 mm²
Transistors189 millionvs727 million
Shaders384vs96
Compute Units0vs4
Core clock300 MHzvs550 MHz
ROPs6vs8
TMUs48vs32

Memory Configuration

Iris Pro Graphics 6200GeForce GT 340 OEM
Memory TypeSystem SharedvsGDDR3
Bus WidthSystem Sharedvs128 bit
Memory SpeedSystem Sharedvs850 MHz
1700 MHz effective
Memory Size0 Mbvs1024 Mb

Additional details

Iris Pro Graphics 6200GeForce GT 340 OEM
TDP15 wattsvs69 watts
Release Date5 Sep 2014vs2 Feb 2010

Raw Performance comparison

Pixel Rate

  • Iris Pro Graphics 6200
    1.80 GP/s
  • GeForce GT 340 OEM
    4.40 GP/s

GigaPixels - higher is better

Texel Rate

  • Iris Pro Graphics 6200
    14.40 GT/s
  • GeForce GT 340 OEM
    17.60 GT/s

GigaTexels - higher is better

Memory bandwidth

  • Iris Pro Graphics 6200
    0.00 GB/s
  • GeForce GT 340 OEM
    27.20 GB/s

GB/s - higher is better

Single precision performance

  • Iris Pro Graphics 6200
    230.40 GFLOPs
  • GeForce GT 340 OEM
    257.30 GFLOPs

GFLOPs - higher is better